FYI, thanks to AI imagery software, we’re able to create very specific fashion and hairstyle examples to illustrate the points being made. In some cases, imagery is exaggerated to hammer home the point. Also, assume links that take you off the site are affiliate links such as links to Amazon. this means we may earn a commission if you buy something.
Samsung Galaxy Watch3 vs Fossil Sport Smartwatch
The Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 is a premium level smartwatch and the Fossil Sport Smartwatch is an entry level smartwatch.
But the Fossil Sport Smartwatch isn’t wholly inferior to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3. The main reason is because they run on different platforms and therefore they both exhibit different advantages and different disadvantages.
For such an affordable watch, the Fossil Sport Smartwatch offers a really good range of tools thanks to the Google Wear OS platform that it’s built on. That means access to Google Maps and Google Assistant.
The Fossil Sport Smartwatch is also a very compact smartwatch which I love. It’s very light and doesn’t feel like a weight on your wrist. I can see how this can be negatively interpreted though — it can feel like a fragile plasticy toy.
The opposite is true for the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3. It’s solid, has a very nice rotating bezel and has a much larger presence in terms of weight and looks. It runs on Samsung’s own Tizen OS which has a really beautiful design, but is technically less impressive than the Wear OS. Ultimately, if you are using a Samsung smartphone, it will bring you the greatest convenience in terms of pairing ease and extra features such as direct access to your emails and messages.
One of the biggest differences between them is the fact that the Fossil Sport Smartwatch has really poor battery life, and this weakness really just shuts down any discussion of how useful it is. The Galaxy Watch 3 lasts multiple days and that’s good.
Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 vs Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle
Before the launch of the Ticwatch Pro 3, I used to rate the Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle as the best Google Wear OS smartwatch. I liked it because it’s honestly one of the best Wear OS smartwatches out there at that time.
It was the first Wear OS smartwatch that I reviewed which didn’t suffer from lag spikes and other annoyances that would be tolerable in the Windows 95 era, but not today.
The Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle also comes with a band and clasp, rather than the more typical strap. This is very unique. Plus, if you prefer something else, you can get another version of the Gen 5 with a different watch case and/or strap. It’s fantastic.
I still prefer the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3, overall, though. It’s all about feelings. I feel that the Gen 5 is great and all but the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 is a much more refined design and also has a much better looking user interface.
I’d point to the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3’s rotating bezel versus the rotating crown on the Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle as evidence. Both of them are used for scrolling but it’s just so much more natural to use the Samsung Galaxy Watch 3.
Samsung Galaxy Watch/Active 2 vs Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle
The Samsung Galaxy Watch and the Samsung Galaxy Active 2 continue the great quality of smartwatches that Samsung puts out, but I think everyone should be aware of one main difference between the two.
The main difference is the heart rate sensor’s quality. The heart rate sensor has been upgraded in the Samsung Galaxy Active 2 while the Galaxy Watch still uses the old school Samsung heart rate sensor which often fails to detect my heart rate (when all other watches would do it just fine).
Now, as compared to the Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle, I’d say the Galaxy Watch Active 2 offers a much more sleek design with its bezel-free design. But the software on the Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle beats both watches because it’s backed by Google and you get the best of Google’s suite.
🔥 Discover how people are putting together the perfect wardrobes and outfits with this new method =>
Samsung Galaxy Watch/ Active 2 vs Fossil Sport Smartwatch
The Fossil Sport Smartwatch is an entry level smartwatch that I really like but it’s honestly no match for most smartwatches these days in terms of battery life.
It can’t last over a day, and sometimes. It’s a bit like a 9-5 employee who will go into power saving mode after work hours.
The flipside is that the Fossil Sport Smartwatch is a very affordable smartwatch that’s very similar to the good old digital watches in terms of size and looks. Whereas the Samsung Galaxy Watch looks like a hunking modern men’s watch while the Samsung Galaxy Active 2 looks like a miniature smartphone on your wrist.
Feature-wise, the Samsung Galaxy Watch and Samsung Galaxy Active 2 are very similar in features, given that they run on the same Tizen operating system. Whereas the Fossil Sport Smartwatch runs on the Wear OS. In essence, I would say the Tizen operating system is much more attractive in design and looks, while the Wear OS is much more utilitarian, given that it has access to a large range of apps including Google apps.
❤️ Would you like to save this?
We'll email this post to you, so you can come back to it later!
